The reading materials for the course suggested watching the following YouTube video about Gregory Crewdson’s work: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7CvoTtus34&feature=youtu.be and then answering the following:-
- Do you think there is more to this work than aesthetic beauty?
- Do you think Crewdson succeeds in making his work ‘psychological’? What does this mean?
- What is your main goal when making pictures? Do you think there’s anything wrong with making beauty your main goal?
Do you think there is more to this work than aesthetic beauty?
I think Crewdon’s work is clearly more than the creation of purely aesthetically pleasing images. There is so much natural beauty in the world, even in the mundane and ordinary, that it begs the question why he would not just go and take those readily available shots in nature, with all his production crew if necessary, if his sole reason to create his images was because they were beautiful.
Instead he chooses to go to extreme, elaborate and almost obsessive lengths to perfect even the minutest detail within his photographs. Crewdson unashamedly wants to create an atmosphere in his shots however. His use of cinematic style lighting, artificial fog and deliberately wetting the road in the photograph above, makes clear his intention that building a particular ambience to his shot creation is crucial. But it seems that this is driven by the goal of evoking more of a response from the viewer. He seems to deliberately choose to capture those times of the day which tend to make us as humans more reflective, or where we might feel a sense of insecurity or danger – at twilight or dusk.
Do you think Crewdson succeeds in making his work ‘psychological’? What does this mean?
All Crewdson’s images seem to be single stills, lingering moments captured within a much bigger, more complex story. There are human beings in all of his images but they are always characters within a plot which is often so ambiguous that Crewdson seems to be willfully challenging us as viewers to edit our own beginnings, middle sections and endings and make our own cinematic ‘take’ on the story. It was interesting in the video to learn that Crewdson’s rather was a psychologist and he would listen through the floorboards to his father’s conversations when he was treating patients. He is premeditatedly inciting us to look beneath the surface of the characters and draw our own conclusions. Interestingly his subjects invariably have blank expressions and are almost directed to act this way for the shoot – this appears to be so that we as viewers can project our chosen state of mind onto the subject rather than obtain any obvious clues directly from the look on their faces.
What is your main goal when making pictures? Do you think there’s anything wrong with making beauty your main goal?
I think that sometimes I take photographs to replicate the beauty I see in an object or a place; I want to create a photocopy of it so that I can own a bit of it, and have it to myself. I also enjoy the challenge of making a beautiful photograph from such objects or places and improving it from the reality of the object if I can. For example, I visited the well known ‘Tulip Stairs’ at the Queen’s House in Greenwich a couple of days ago. Looking up the spiral staircase creates a wonderful impression like the curl of a seashell. Whilst the location was clearly architecturally stunning and beautiful, the staircase design delicate, I wanted to improve on what I saw as I edited the images – increasing the contrast and de-saturating the images added a dramatic impact, and taking the shot as less standard angles also provided a different perspective.
To me there is nothing wrong with having the end goal of creating a beautiful image in sight when you make a photograph. It’s not to say also, that the image itself won’t evoke different feelings and memories in others when they look at the images too. For example, the shapes in the photograph remind me of the game ‘Spirograph’ I used to play with a sa child and the tiled flooring makes me think of a roulette wheel. An image is rarely just plain beautiful, it will always conjure up an idea, or a memory in someone’s mind and means that even the very ‘low level’ or basic images can evoke a range of feelings, not just aesthetic pleasure, and therefore should not mean they are in any way diminished in stature by not being ‘complex’ enough.